Talk:Kaboom Clones: Difference between revisions
From Kaboom Wiki
Improve discussion Tag: Reverted |
m Reverted edit by 185.16.39.232 (talk) to last revision by Opt Tag: Rollback |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:: He has gone on to evade his block, again, and edit this talk page clarifying that the clone is a long living "weird device" clone and probably has the most uptime of any currently running clone. Which is probably true, but not because the clone is exceptional in any way - merely that people don't want to play on the clone of someone who sent links to CSAM in chat. --[[User:Opt|Opt]] ([[User talk:Opt|talk]]) 07:25, 6 August 2026 (UTC) | :: He has gone on to evade his block, again, and edit this talk page clarifying that the clone is a long living "weird device" clone and probably has the most uptime of any currently running clone. Which is probably true, but not because the clone is exceptional in any way - merely that people don't want to play on the clone of someone who sent links to CSAM in chat. --[[User:Opt|Opt]] ([[User talk:Opt|talk]]) 07:25, 6 August 2026 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:39, 6 August 2026
Dedicated page for NX/Switchboom
- cxvqo created a page documenting this clone individually, of course containing nonsensical information, but I do have to wonder if the clone running on a Nintendo Switch is enough for an article to be written about it. Though, Kaboom clones have been ran on a lot of weird & weirder devices, but it seems nonsensical to document them all, so I think I'll make an article that documents Kaboom running in weird places. --Opt (talk) 11:37, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- He has gone on to evade his block, again, and edit this talk page clarifying that the clone is a long living "weird device" clone and probably has the most uptime of any currently running clone. Which is probably true, but not because the clone is exceptional in any way - merely that people don't want to play on the clone of someone who sent links to CSAM in chat. --Opt (talk) 07:25, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
