User talk:CaydennO1/Drafts/Cxvqo belief: Difference between revisions
From Kaboom Wiki
No edit summary |
Remove spam |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Comment == | |||
A little comment, about this article not having a "neutral point of view," If I was biased at all, I would probably not have made an article.. right? In addition, Cxvqo himself has told me that the article is neutral (though he doesn't like the article at all ofc). --[[User:CaydennO1|CaydennO1]] ([[User talk:CaydennO1|talk]]) 00:42, 26 October 2026 (UTC) | |||
: Considering Cxvqo is the main subject of the article, I would personally disregard whatever he has to say about the objectivity or bias of a given article. He also has proven as an unreliable source in general (see: contents of the page), and as such should not be trusted otherwise. The article is marked as COI because it is written entirely by you and you are the closest thing Cxvqo has to a friend on Kaboom, despite [[Cxvqo|the Cxvqo page]] existing. --[[User:Opt|Opt]] ([[User talk:Opt|talk]]) 01:05, 26 October 2026 (UTC) | |||
:: With regards to the Cxvqo article itself, I hadn't considered myself an acquaintance of Cxvqo for multiple months before the article was written. I appreciate that I may have some negative bias towards Denis, however I am confident that the article was written as unbiased as possible in all important metrics. --[[User:Opt|Opt]] ([[User talk:Opt|talk]]) 01:05, 26 October 2026 (UTC) | |||
== Move into main Cxvqo page == | |||
Should this be moved into the main page, after some cleanup? Some other theorycrafting done by him/cxvqoisms may include CultNS, and that the dissemination of information about the CSAM link he sent is some sort of political persecution. Maybe it should be under a heading like "Disconnect from reality"?. --[[User:Opt|Opt]] ([[User talk:Opt|talk]]) 09:28, 25 October 2026 (UTC) | |||
: Oh, and as an aside, [https://www.who.int/china/health-topics/mental-health according to WHO], there are an estimated 54 million people in China suffering from depression. Meanwhile cxvqo's source is an obvious skit. --[[User:Opt|Opt]] ([[User talk:Opt|talk]]) 09:44, 25 October 2026 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 01:07, 26 October 2026
Comment
A little comment, about this article not having a "neutral point of view," If I was biased at all, I would probably not have made an article.. right? In addition, Cxvqo himself has told me that the article is neutral (though he doesn't like the article at all ofc). --CaydennO1 (talk) 00:42, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
- Considering Cxvqo is the main subject of the article, I would personally disregard whatever he has to say about the objectivity or bias of a given article. He also has proven as an unreliable source in general (see: contents of the page), and as such should not be trusted otherwise. The article is marked as COI because it is written entirely by you and you are the closest thing Cxvqo has to a friend on Kaboom, despite the Cxvqo page existing. --Opt (talk) 01:05, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
- With regards to the Cxvqo article itself, I hadn't considered myself an acquaintance of Cxvqo for multiple months before the article was written. I appreciate that I may have some negative bias towards Denis, however I am confident that the article was written as unbiased as possible in all important metrics. --Opt (talk) 01:05, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
Move into main Cxvqo page
Should this be moved into the main page, after some cleanup? Some other theorycrafting done by him/cxvqoisms may include CultNS, and that the dissemination of information about the CSAM link he sent is some sort of political persecution. Maybe it should be under a heading like "Disconnect from reality"?. --Opt (talk) 09:28, 25 October 2026 (UTC)
- Oh, and as an aside, according to WHO, there are an estimated 54 million people in China suffering from depression. Meanwhile cxvqo's source is an obvious skit. --Opt (talk) 09:44, 25 October 2026 (UTC)
