Talk:Kaboom Clones: Difference between revisions

From Kaboom Wiki
Tag: Undo
m Add signature
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
: [[Cxvqo|cxvqo]] created a page documenting this clone individually, of course containing nonsensical information, but I do have to wonder if the clone running on a Nintendo Switch is enough for an article to be written about it. Though, Kaboom clones have been ran on a lot of weird & weirder devices, but it seems nonsensical to document them all, so I think I'll make an article that documents Kaboom running in weird places. --[[User:Opt|Opt]] ([[User talk:Opt|talk]]) 11:37, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
: [[Cxvqo|cxvqo]] created a page documenting this clone individually, of course containing nonsensical information, but I do have to wonder if the clone running on a Nintendo Switch is enough for an article to be written about it. Though, Kaboom clones have been ran on a lot of weird & weirder devices, but it seems nonsensical to document them all, so I think I'll make an article that documents Kaboom running in weird places. --[[User:Opt|Opt]] ([[User talk:Opt|talk]]) 11:37, 5 August 2026 (UTC)


: the clone probably did have highest uptime of any clone tho, how that is nonsensical? And other info I put is just that it run on Nintendo Switch and its address —- [[User:Cxvqo|cxvqo]] ([[User talk:Cxvqo|talk]]) 18:18, 5 August 2026 (GMT+3)
:: He has gone on to evade his block, again, and edit this talk page clarifying that the clone is a long living "weird device" clone and probably has the most uptime of any currently running clone. Which is probably true, but not because the clone is exceptional in any way - merely that people don't want to play on the clone of someone who sent links to CSAM in chat. --[[User:Opt|Opt]] ([[User talk:Opt|talk]]) 07:25, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
 
== Per what are you sorting the clones. ==
 
Name, creation date, address, host name, how are you sorting them?
 
: Clones ran by people like [[Cxvqo|cxvqo]] are always at the bottom, regardless of creation date. Otherwise, clones are sorted by the current iteration creation date. Therefore, new/returning clones should be added above NX. --[[User:Opt|Opt]] ([[User talk:Opt|talk]]) 18:42, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 18:42, 8 August 2026

Dedicated page for NX/Switchboom[edit]

cxvqo created a page documenting this clone individually, of course containing nonsensical information, but I do have to wonder if the clone running on a Nintendo Switch is enough for an article to be written about it. Though, Kaboom clones have been ran on a lot of weird & weirder devices, but it seems nonsensical to document them all, so I think I'll make an article that documents Kaboom running in weird places. --Opt (talk) 11:37, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
He has gone on to evade his block, again, and edit this talk page clarifying that the clone is a long living "weird device" clone and probably has the most uptime of any currently running clone. Which is probably true, but not because the clone is exceptional in any way - merely that people don't want to play on the clone of someone who sent links to CSAM in chat. --Opt (talk) 07:25, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

Per what are you sorting the clones.[edit]

Name, creation date, address, host name, how are you sorting them?

Clones ran by people like cxvqo are always at the bottom, regardless of creation date. Otherwise, clones are sorted by the current iteration creation date. Therefore, new/returning clones should be added above NX. --Opt (talk) 18:42, 8 August 2026 (UTC)